-
Mashup Score: 5Patient and Survivor Care - 3 day(s) ago
Patient and Survivor Care
Source: society.asco.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists2Tweet
-
Mashup Score: 2Victorian Quality Cancer Survivorship Care Framework and Policy Template (2021) - Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre - 4 day(s) ago
The Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre (ACSC), funded by the Victorian Government, conducted a literature review, environmental scan, Delphi study and expert consensus meeting to answer the question ‘what quality criteria do survivorship experts consider to be important in achieving optimal cancer survivorship care?’ This work is reflected in the Victorian Cancer Plan 2020-24, action area 4.3: ‘Activity in the next four years will develop and implement a framework to define and measure the quality
Source: www.petermac.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists2Tweet
-
Mashup Score: 2How Do We Define and Measure Optimal Care for Cancer Survivors? An Online Modified Reactive Delphi Study - 4 day(s) ago
This research sought to answer the question ‘what quality criteria do survivorship experts consider to be important in achieving optimal cancer survivorship care?’. An online modified reactive Delphi survey consisting of two rounds was completed with experts including consumers, clinicians, researchers, policymakers and quality and accreditation professionals. Survey items were based on international literature and considered three domains: Policy, process and outcome. In round 1 (R1), experts ranked the importance of 68 criteria on a five-point Likert scale. Criteria were retained if scored 4 (important) or 5 (very important) by >75% participants. In round 2 (R2), experts ranked top 10 criteria per domain. Response rates were 79% (70/89) and 84% (76/91), respectively. After R1, six criteria were removed and six were added. From R2, ten items for each domain were retained. These 30 items formed the Quality Framework. A consensus meeting considered priority items from the Quality Framew
Source: www.mdpi.comCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists2Tweet
-
Mashup Score: 25Developing national cancer survivorship standards to inform quality of care in the United States using a consensus approach - 4 day(s) ago
Journal of Cancer Survivorship – To develop United States (US) standards for survivorship care that informs (1) essential health system policy and process components and (2) evaluation of the…
Source: link.springer.comCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists2Tweet
-
Mashup Score: 47Implementing a Clinical Pathway for Needs Assessment and Supportive Care Interventions - 11 day(s) ago
Despite advances in clinical cancer care, cancer survivors frequently report a range of persisting issues, unmet needs, and concerns that limit their ability to participate in life roles and reduce quality of life. Needs assessment is recognized as an important component of cancer care delivery, ideally beginning during active treatment to connect patients with supportive services that address these issues in a timely manner. Despite the recognized importance of this process, many health care systems have struggled to implement a feasible and sustainable needs assessment and management system. This article uses an implementation science framework to guide pragmatic implementation of a needs assessment clinical system in cancer care. According to this framework, successful implementation requires four steps including (1) choosing a needs assessment tool; (2) carefully considering the provider level, clinic level, and health care system–level strengths and barriers to implementation and
Source: ascopubs.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists2Tweet
-
Mashup Score: 18The Latest Research on Scientific Posters 2024 |🧪Presentation - 11 day(s) ago
Download latest poster templates:https://scienceux.org/free-resourcesMore science-design research:ScienceUX.orgreddit.com/r/scienceUXButterPoster alternative…
Source: www.youtube.comCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists2Tweet
-
Mashup Score: 9Wisdom from 'The West' - 28 day(s) ago
Save the date for Wisdom from ‘The West’ a conference to celebrate the achievements of Professor Catharine West who is retiring in December 2022.
Source: www.mcrc.manchester.ac.ukCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists2Tweet
-
Mashup Score: 1Victorian Quality Cancer Survivorship Care Framework and Policy Template (2021) - Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre - 3 month(s) ago
The Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre (ACSC), funded by the Victorian Government, conducted a literature review, environmental scan, Delphi study and expert consensus meeting to answer the question ‘what quality criteria do survivorship experts consider to be important in achieving optimal cancer survivorship care?’ This work is reflected in the Victorian Cancer Plan 2020-24, action area 4.3: ‘Activity in the next four years will develop and implement a framework to define and measure the quality
Source: www.petermac.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists2Tweet
-
Mashup Score: 19
Advice from Peter Mac’s Professor Michael Jefford is helping the United States National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the US Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) to develop national survivorship standards for people with cancer. The Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre (ACSC), based at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Melbourne, previously developed the Victorian Quality Cancer Survivorship Care Framework and Policy template to improve the quality of care provided for cancer survivors. Professor Jefford,
Source: www.petermac.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists2Tweet
-
Mashup Score: 1How Do We Define and Measure Optimal Care for Cancer Survivors? An Online Modified Reactive Delphi Study - 3 month(s) ago
This research sought to answer the question ‘what quality criteria do survivorship experts consider to be important in achieving optimal cancer survivorship care?’. An online modified reactive Delphi survey consisting of two rounds was completed with experts including consumers, clinicians, researchers, policymakers and quality and accreditation professionals. Survey items were based on international literature and considered three domains: Policy, process and outcome. In round 1 (R1), experts ranked the importance of 68 criteria on a five-point Likert scale. Criteria were retained if scored 4 (important) or 5 (very important) by >75% participants. In round 2 (R2), experts ranked top 10 criteria per domain. Response rates were 79% (70/89) and 84% (76/91), respectively. After R1, six criteria were removed and six were added. From R2, ten items for each domain were retained. These 30 items formed the Quality Framework. A consensus meeting considered priority items from the Quality Framew
Source: www.mdpi.comCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists2Tweet
and lots of resources at https://t.co/7paxpGIXra https://t.co/xJItFmoPY6